Mark Scanlon vs.
Pascal Krauss
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Mark Scanlon
Full career not yet synced for Mark Scanlon — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Pascal Krauss
Full career not yet synced for Pascal Krauss — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Mark Scanlon
Distance 84.0% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 9.6% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 6.4% (norm 8.1%)
Pascal Krauss
Distance 77.9% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 15.2% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 7.0% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Mark Scanlon
Head 88.3% (norm 78.2%) · Body 7.4% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 4.3% (norm 8.4%)
Pascal Krauss
Head 79.9% (norm 78.2%) · Body 10.9% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 9.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Scanlon L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Krauss L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 26 / 79 | 32.9% | 38.6% | 176 / 437 | 40.3% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 9 | too few to rate | 67.8% | 60 / 85 | 70.6% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 4 / 6 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 31 / 39 | 79.5% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 28 / 83 | 33.7% | 37.2% | 172 / 448 | 38.4% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 2 / 7 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 46 / 61 | 75.4% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 49 / 52 | 94.2% | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Scanlon L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Krauss L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 11 / 47 | 23.4% | 39.0% | 139 / 383 | 36.3% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 14 / 18 | too few to rate | 68.9% | 25 / 41 | 61.0% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 25 / 33 | 75.8% | 68.0% | 26 / 41 | 63.4% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 24 / 67 | 35.8% | 35.6% | 133 / 386 | 34.5% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 21 / 25 | 84.0% | 69.6% | 30 / 50 | 60.0% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 5 / 6 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 27 / 29 | 93.1% | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Krauss has more cage time on record.