Mark Godbeer vs. Justin Ledet
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Mark Godbeer
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 11 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.66 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 18 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
Justin Ledet
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.85 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Mark Godbeer
Distance 80.0% (norm 79.2%) · Clinch 13.0% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 7.0% (norm 9.3%)
Justin Ledet
Distance 97.5% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 2.3% (norm 8.8%) · Ground 0.2% (norm 10.6%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Mark Godbeer
Head 67.0% (norm 79.2%) · Body 23.5% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 9.6% (norm 7.6%)
Justin Ledet
Head 96.1% (norm 78.5%) · Body 3.2% (norm 11.8%) · Legs 0.7% (norm 9.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Godbeer L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med | Ledet L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 88 / 184 | 47.8% | 40.1% | 208 / 545 | 38.2% | 41.5% |
| In the clinch | 22 / 30 | 73.3% | 70.4% | 9 / 13 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 14 / 16 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 72.9% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 65 / 154 | 42.2% | 39.0% | 203 / 537 | 37.8% | 39.2% |
| To the body | 42 / 54 | 77.8% | 77.0% | 13 / 18 | too few to rate | 72.0% |
| To the legs | 17 / 22 | too few to rate | 87.8% | 2 / 4 | too few to rate | 82.1% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Light Heavyweight: 94 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Godbeer L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med | vs Ledet L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 60 / 170 | 35.3% | 40.7% | 206 / 473 | 43.6% | 40.6% |
| In the clinch | 14 / 22 | too few to rate | 70.6% | 21 / 32 | 65.6% | 68.8% |
| On the ground | 29 / 33 | 87.9% | 72.2% | 87 / 111 | 78.4% | 70.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 75 / 187 | 40.1% | 39.3% | 200 / 441 | 45.4% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 22 / 30 | 73.3% | 75.1% | 47 / 83 | 56.6% | 72.9% |
| To the legs | 6 / 8 | too few to rate | 84.4% | 67 / 92 | 72.8% | 83.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Ledet has more cage time on record.