Mac Danzig vs.
Tommy Speer
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Mac Danzig
Full career not yet synced for Mac Danzig — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Tommy Speer
Full career not yet synced for Tommy Speer — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Mac Danzig
Distance 77.3% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 13.4% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 9.3% (norm 8.0%)
Tommy Speer
Distance 64.3% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 35.7% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Mac Danzig
Head 81.3% (norm 78.2%) · Body 11.8% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 6.9% (norm 7.9%)
Tommy Speer
Head 64.3% (norm 78.2%) · Body 21.4% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 14.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Danzig L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Speer L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 338 / 762 | 44.4% | 37.9% | 0 / 9 | too few to rate | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 97 / 132 | 73.5% | 67.3% | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 57 / 92 | 62.0% | 69.1% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 337 / 802 | 42.0% | 35.0% | 0 / 9 | too few to rate | 37.2% |
| To the body | 95 / 116 | 81.9% | 69.1% | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 60 / 68 | 88.2% | 81.9% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Danzig L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Speer L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 243 / 780 | 31.2% | 38.9% | 9 / 19 | too few to rate | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 139 / 189 | 73.5% | 68.6% | 9 / 10 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 95 / 146 | 65.1% | 68.0% | 7 / 10 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 289 / 893 | 32.4% | 35.1% | 19 / 32 | 59.4% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 100 / 128 | 78.1% | 68.1% | 5 / 6 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 88 / 94 | 93.6% | 81.5% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Danzig has more cage time on record.