Luana Santos vs.
Stephanie Egger
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Luana Santos
Full career not yet synced for Luana Santos — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 3-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.1 wins over .500
Stephanie Egger
Full career not yet synced for Stephanie Egger — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Luana Santos
Distance 89.3% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 9.3% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 1.4% (norm 7.5%)
Stephanie Egger
Distance 76.0% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 13.2% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Luana Santos
Head 71.7% (norm 75.2%) · Body 20.9% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 7.4% (norm 8.8%)
Stephanie Egger
Head 80.6% (norm 75.2%) · Body 9.7% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 9.7% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Santos L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Egger L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 174 / 325 | 53.5% | 38.3% | 67 / 196 | 34.2% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 17 / 34 | 50.0% | 73.3% | 23 / 28 | 82.1% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 30 / 34 | 88.2% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 115 / 261 | 44.1% | 37.7% | 80 / 208 | 38.5% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 57 / 76 | 75.0% | 70.0% | 19 / 25 | 76.0% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 23 / 27 | 85.2% | 80.9% | 21 / 25 | 84.0% | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Santos L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Egger L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 149 / 478 | 31.2% | 41.3% | 112 / 245 | 45.7% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 30 / 43 | 69.8% | 74.7% | 10 / 18 | too few to rate | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 10 / 10 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 13 / 19 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 123 / 426 | 28.9% | 38.1% | 55 / 174 | 31.6% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 43 / 67 | 64.2% | 73.2% | 52 / 71 | 73.2% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 23 / 38 | 60.5% | 80.9% | 28 / 37 | 75.7% | 80.9% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Santos has more cage time on record.