Lorenz Larkin vs. Chris Camozzi
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Lorenz Larkin
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 14 | 8 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 13 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.24 · 14 tier-1/2 wins · 15 finish wins over 37 documented bouts
In the UFC: 5-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.1 wins over .500
Chris Camozzi
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 11 | 11 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 16 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.69 · 11 tier-1/2 wins · 14 finish wins over 42 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.7 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Lorenz Larkin
Distance 83.9% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 13.1% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 3.0% (norm 8.1%)
Chris Camozzi
Distance 88.5% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 10.1% (norm 9.0%) · Ground 1.5% (norm 10.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Lorenz Larkin
Head 68.8% (norm 78.3%) · Body 11.2% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 20.0% (norm 8.0%)
Chris Camozzi
Head 76.5% (norm 78.0%) · Body 9.9% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 13.6% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Larkin L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Camozzi L/A | Acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 293 / 735 | 39.9% | 38.5% | 655 / 1575 | 41.6% | 40.5% |
| In the clinch | 75 / 115 | 65.2% | 67.8% | 126 / 179 | 70.4% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 23 / 26 | 88.5% | 67.0% | 19 / 26 | 73.1% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 191 / 603 | 31.7% | 36.4% | 470 / 1362 | 34.5% | 38.8% |
| To the body | 61 / 98 | 62.2% | 70.7% | 130 / 176 | 73.9% | 71.6% |
| To the legs | 139 / 175 | 79.4% | 83.0% | 200 / 242 | 82.6% | 83.3% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 180 fighters · Middleweight: 178 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Larkin L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Camozzi L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 274 / 794 | 34.5% | 39.1% | 442 / 1206 | 36.7% | 39.5% |
| In the clinch | 42 / 61 | 68.9% | 68.9% | 133 / 191 | 69.6% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 7 / 7 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 89 / 124 | 71.8% | 69.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 173 / 629 | 27.5% | 35.6% | 366 / 1106 | 33.1% | 37.9% |
| To the body | 63 / 114 | 55.3% | 69.6% | 136 / 225 | 60.4% | 71.3% |
| To the legs | 87 / 119 | 73.1% | 82.2% | 162 / 190 | 85.3% | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Camozzi has more cage time on record.