Lisa Ellis vs.
Bec Rawlings
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Lisa Ellis
Full career not yet synced for Lisa Ellis — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.5 wins over .500
Bec Rawlings
Full career not yet synced for Bec Rawlings — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Lisa Ellis
Distance 50.0% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 31.8% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 18.2% (norm 5.0%)
Bec Rawlings
Distance 86.3% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 2.8% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Lisa Ellis
Head 81.8% (norm 76.4%) · Body 18.2% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 0.0% (norm 9.1%)
Bec Rawlings
Head 81.5% (norm 76.4%) · Body 12.5% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 6.0% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Ellis L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Rawlings L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 3 / 11 | too few to rate | 38.3% | 293 / 762 | 38.5% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 4 / 7 | too few to rate | 72.6% | 65 / 96 | 67.7% | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 75.0% | 20 / 25 | 80.0% | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 9 / 18 | too few to rate | 35.4% | 263 / 720 | 36.5% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 2 / 4 | too few to rate | 69.3% | 67 / 110 | 60.9% | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 77.9% | 48 / 53 | 90.6% | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Ellis L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Rawlings L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 5 / 20 | too few to rate | 39.7% | 393 / 997 | 39.4% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 15 | too few to rate | 71.5% | 57 / 86 | 66.3% | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 14 / 19 | too few to rate | 74.4% | 28 / 37 | 75.7% | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 25 / 48 | 52.1% | 36.0% | 301 / 866 | 34.8% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 4 / 6 | too few to rate | 68.4% | 97 / 152 | 63.8% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 79.1% | 80 / 102 | 78.4% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Rawlings has more cage time on record.