Lina Lansberg vs.
Aspen Ladd
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Lina Lansberg
Full career not yet synced for Lina Lansberg — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Aspen Ladd
Full career not yet synced for Aspen Ladd — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 2-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.7 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Lina Lansberg
Distance 58.7% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 29.7% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 11.5% (norm 7.5%)
Aspen Ladd
Distance 64.8% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 11.8% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 23.3% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Lina Lansberg
Head 69.8% (norm 75.2%) · Body 25.2% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 5.0% (norm 8.8%)
Aspen Ladd
Head 85.7% (norm 75.2%) · Body 11.5% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 2.8% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Lansberg L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Ladd L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 159 / 413 | 38.5% | 38.3% | 136 / 400 | 34.0% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 170 / 209 | 81.3% | 73.3% | 52 / 73 | 71.2% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 61 / 81 | 75.3% | 70.8% | 102 / 144 | 70.8% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 206 / 491 | 42.0% | 37.7% | 224 / 529 | 42.3% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 154 / 177 | 87.0% | 70.0% | 51 / 71 | 71.8% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 30 / 35 | 85.7% | 80.9% | 15 / 17 | too few to rate | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Lansberg L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Ladd L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 270 / 626 | 43.1% | 41.3% | 235 / 524 | 44.8% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 182 / 231 | 78.8% | 74.7% | 117 / 143 | 81.8% | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 108 / 145 | 74.5% | 74.2% | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 312 / 702 | 44.4% | 38.1% | 187 / 482 | 38.8% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 193 / 232 | 83.2% | 73.2% | 138 / 155 | 89.0% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 55 / 68 | 80.9% | 80.9% | 32 / 37 | 86.5% | 80.9% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Lansberg has more cage time on record.