Khaos Williams vs. Roberto Soldic
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Khaos Williams
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 9 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.24 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 10 finish wins over 21 documented bouts
In the UFC: 5-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.5 wins over .500
Roberto Soldic
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 1 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 19 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.01 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 19 finish wins over 26 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Khaos Williams
Distance 93.3% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 4.6% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 2.0% (norm 8.1%)
Roberto Soldic
Distance 85.8% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 0.0% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 14.2% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Khaos Williams
Head 70.8% (norm 78.3%) · Body 12.2% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 17.0% (norm 8.0%)
Roberto Soldic
Head 80.2% (norm 78.3%) · Body 15.4% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 4.3% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Williams L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Soldic L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 477 / 1305 | 36.6% | 38.5% | 78 / 139 | 56.1% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 39 / 65 | 60.0% | 67.8% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 18 / 28 | 64.3% | 67.0% | 16 / 23 | too few to rate | 67.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 255 / 990 | 25.8% | 36.4% | 68 / 130 | 52.3% | 36.4% |
| To the body | 109 / 171 | 63.7% | 70.7% | 20 / 25 | 80.0% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 170 / 237 | 71.7% | 83.0% | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 83.0% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 180 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Williams L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Soldic L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 505 / 931 | 54.2% | 39.1% | 27 / 104 | 26.0% | 39.1% |
| In the clinch | 96 / 108 | 88.9% | 68.9% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 37 / 46 | 80.4% | 68.0% | 0 / 2 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 424 / 820 | 51.7% | 35.6% | 12 / 83 | 14.5% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 105 / 140 | 75.0% | 69.6% | 6 / 14 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 109 / 125 | 87.2% | 82.2% | 9 / 9 | too few to rate | 82.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Williams has more cage time on record.