Kevin Randleman vs. Renato Sobral
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Kevin Randleman
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 13 |
Tier-weighted record quality: -0.4 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 28 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.1 wins over .500
Renato Sobral
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 30 | 6 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.84 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 24 finish wins over 49 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.1 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Kevin Randleman
Distance 26.2% (norm 79.2%) · Clinch 6.1% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 67.7% (norm 9.3%)
Renato Sobral
Distance 29.0% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 10.0% (norm 8.8%) · Ground 61.0% (norm 10.6%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Kevin Randleman
Head 95.8% (norm 79.2%) · Body 3.4% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 0.8% (norm 7.6%)
Renato Sobral
Head 79.4% (norm 78.5%) · Body 10.6% (norm 11.8%) · Legs 10.0% (norm 9.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Randleman L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med | Sobral L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 18 / 69 | 26.1% | 40.1% | 37 / 90 | 41.1% | 41.5% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 16 | too few to rate | 70.4% | 20 / 31 | 64.5% | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 69 / 178 | 38.8% | 70.2% | 105 / 189 | 55.6% | 72.9% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 89 / 252 | 35.3% | 39.0% | 110 / 246 | 44.7% | 39.2% |
| To the body | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 77.0% | 25 / 33 | 75.8% | 72.0% |
| To the legs | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 87.8% | 27 / 31 | 87.1% | 82.1% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Light Heavyweight: 94 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Randleman L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med | vs Sobral L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 27 / 99 | 27.3% | 40.7% | 39 / 95 | 41.1% | 40.6% |
| In the clinch | 22 / 28 | 78.6% | 70.6% | 11 / 16 | too few to rate | 68.8% |
| On the ground | 31 / 45 | 68.9% | 72.2% | 51 / 94 | 54.3% | 70.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 40 / 126 | 31.7% | 39.3% | 82 / 181 | 45.3% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 19 / 22 | too few to rate | 75.1% | 12 / 16 | too few to rate | 72.9% |
| To the legs | 21 / 24 | too few to rate | 84.4% | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 83.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Sobral has more cage time on record.