Julie Kedzie vs.
Bethe Correia
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Julie Kedzie
Full career not yet synced for Julie Kedzie — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Bethe Correia
Full career not yet synced for Bethe Correia — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 2-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Julie Kedzie
Distance 92.4% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 7.6% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 7.5%)
Bethe Correia
Distance 91.2% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 8.4% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 0.5% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Julie Kedzie
Head 80.2% (norm 75.2%) · Body 13.4% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 6.5% (norm 8.8%)
Bethe Correia
Head 73.2% (norm 75.2%) · Body 16.4% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 10.4% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Kedzie L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Correia L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 66 / 242 | 27.3% | 38.3% | 573 / 1381 | 41.5% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 16 / 20 | too few to rate | 73.3% | 87 / 127 | 68.5% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 4 / 7 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 37 / 210 | 17.6% | 37.7% | 381 / 1109 | 34.4% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 29 / 35 | 82.9% | 70.0% | 163 / 248 | 65.7% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 16 / 17 | too few to rate | 80.9% | 120 / 158 | 75.9% | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Kedzie L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Correia L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 73 / 154 | 47.4% | 41.3% | 583 / 1487 | 39.2% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 42 / 46 | 91.3% | 74.7% | 119 / 162 | 73.5% | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 48 / 57 | 84.2% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 37 / 111 | 33.3% | 38.1% | 505 / 1400 | 36.1% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 36 / 42 | 85.7% | 73.2% | 153 / 201 | 76.1% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 42 / 47 | 89.4% | 80.9% | 92 / 105 | 87.6% | 80.9% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Correia has more cage time on record.