Juliana Lima vs.
Ericka Almeida
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Juliana Lima
Full career not yet synced for Juliana Lima — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500
Ericka Almeida
Full career not yet synced for Ericka Almeida — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Juliana Lima
Distance 66.1% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 19.0% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 14.9% (norm 5.0%)
Ericka Almeida
Distance 51.9% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 29.6% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 18.5% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Juliana Lima
Head 65.4% (norm 76.4%) · Body 15.9% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 18.7% (norm 9.1%)
Ericka Almeida
Head 82.7% (norm 76.4%) · Body 14.8% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 2.5% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Lima L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Almeida L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 82 / 279 | 29.4% | 38.3% | 16 / 42 | 38.1% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 65 / 80 | 81.2% | 72.6% | 13 / 24 | too few to rate | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 39 / 63 | 61.9% | 75.0% | 3 / 15 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 84 / 276 | 30.4% | 35.4% | 23 / 67 | 34.3% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 49 / 67 | 73.1% | 69.3% | 7 / 12 | too few to rate | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 53 / 79 | 67.1% | 77.9% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Lima L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Almeida L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 84 / 304 | 27.6% | 39.7% | 23 / 48 | 47.9% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 77 / 101 | 76.2% | 71.5% | 22 / 33 | 66.7% | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 41 / 54 | 75.9% | 74.4% | 55 / 96 | 57.3% | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 85 / 304 | 28.0% | 36.0% | 67 / 136 | 49.3% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 82 / 110 | 74.5% | 68.4% | 18 / 25 | 72.0% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 35 / 45 | 77.8% | 79.1% | 15 / 16 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Lima has more cage time on record.