Julia Avila vs. Pannie Kianzad
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Julia Avila
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.85 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 13 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
Pannie Kianzad
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 6 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 2 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 9 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.55 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 3 finish wins over 25 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.6 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Julia Avila
Distance 87.6% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 10.0% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 2.3% (norm 7.3%)
Pannie Kianzad
Distance 86.7% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 11.6% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 1.7% (norm 7.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Julia Avila
Head 76.8% (norm 75.5%) · Body 11.7% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 11.5% (norm 8.7%)
Pannie Kianzad
Head 81.0% (norm 75.5%) · Body 13.7% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 5.3% (norm 8.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Avila L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Kianzad L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 157 / 411 | 38.2% | 38.5% | 576 / 1256 | 45.9% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 33 / 47 | 70.2% | 74.3% | 123 / 168 | 73.2% | 74.3% |
| On the ground | 9 / 11 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 14 / 24 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 117 / 360 | 32.5% | 37.7% | 498 / 1173 | 42.5% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 36 / 55 | 65.5% | 71.1% | 141 / 198 | 71.2% | 71.1% |
| To the legs | 46 / 54 | 85.2% | 80.8% | 74 / 77 | 96.1% | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Avila L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Kianzad L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 166 / 431 | 38.5% | 41.3% | 479 / 1064 | 45.0% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 11 / 21 | too few to rate | 75.0% | 96 / 136 | 70.6% | 75.0% |
| On the ground | 56 / 72 | 77.8% | 74.2% | 23 / 31 | 74.2% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 186 / 459 | 40.5% | 37.7% | 398 / 968 | 41.1% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 27 / 38 | 71.1% | 73.2% | 95 / 135 | 70.4% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 20 / 27 | 74.1% | 80.9% | 105 / 128 | 82.0% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Kianzad has more cage time on record.