Jon Jones vs. Andre Gusmao
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jon Jones
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 22 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 2.19 · 22 tier-1/2 wins · 18 finish wins over 30 documented bouts
In the UFC: 21-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +4.9 wins over .500
Andre Gusmao
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.45 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 9 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jon Jones
Distance 72.2% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 13.0% (norm 8.8%) · Ground 14.7% (norm 10.6%)
Andre Gusmao
Distance 60.7% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 39.3% (norm 8.8%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 10.6%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jon Jones
Head 60.1% (norm 78.5%) · Body 18.6% (norm 11.8%) · Legs 21.3% (norm 9.7%)
Andre Gusmao
Head 53.0% (norm 78.5%) · Body 29.1% (norm 11.8%) · Legs 17.9% (norm 9.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Jones L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | Gusmao L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 1012 / 1918 | 52.8% | 41.5% | 32 / 71 | 45.1% | 41.5% |
| In the clinch | 250 / 346 | 72.3% | 70.8% | 19 / 46 | 41.3% | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 302 / 391 | 77.2% | 72.9% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 72.9% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 759 / 1595 | 47.6% | 39.2% | 14 / 62 | 22.6% | 39.2% |
| To the body | 375 / 494 | 75.9% | 72.0% | 19 / 34 | 55.9% | 72.0% |
| To the legs | 430 / 566 | 76.0% | 82.1% | 18 / 21 | too few to rate | 82.1% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 94 fighters · Light Heavyweight: 94 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Jones L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs Gusmao L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 637 / 1921 | 33.2% | 40.6% | 27 / 92 | 29.3% | 40.6% |
| In the clinch | 154 / 289 | 53.3% | 68.8% | 28 / 53 | 52.8% | 68.8% |
| On the ground | 7 / 12 | too few to rate | 70.4% | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 70.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 385 / 1573 | 24.5% | 37.7% | 40 / 119 | 33.6% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 217 / 367 | 59.1% | 72.9% | 16 / 25 | 64.0% | 72.9% |
| To the legs | 196 / 282 | 69.5% | 83.1% | 4 / 8 | too few to rate | 83.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Jones has more cage time on record.