Johnny Bedford vs. Cody Gibson
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Johnny Bedford
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 3 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 0 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 20 | 10 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.23 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 19 finish wins over 39 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Cody Gibson
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 8 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 17 | 5 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.41 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 34 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.1 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Johnny Bedford
Distance 59.2% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 29.9% (norm 6.4%)
Cody Gibson
Distance 80.9% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 16.1% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 3.0% (norm 6.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Johnny Bedford
Head 78.3% (norm 77.5%) · Body 18.5% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 3.3% (norm 8.4%)
Cody Gibson
Head 78.9% (norm 77.5%) · Body 14.7% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 6.4% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Bedford L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Gibson L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 79 / 218 | 36.2% | 39.2% | 284 / 695 | 40.9% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 31 / 40 | 77.5% | 69.0% | 102 / 138 | 73.9% | 69.0% |
| On the ground | 76 / 110 | 69.1% | 70.2% | 17 / 26 | 65.4% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 120 / 288 | 41.7% | 35.3% | 269 / 678 | 39.7% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 56 / 68 | 82.4% | 66.9% | 88 / 126 | 69.8% | 66.9% |
| To the legs | 10 / 12 | too few to rate | 79.2% | 46 / 55 | 83.6% | 79.2% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 121 fighters · Bantamweight: 121 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Bedford L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Gibson L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 63 / 179 | 35.2% | 39.4% | 269 / 677 | 39.7% | 39.4% |
| In the clinch | 8 / 15 | too few to rate | 70.6% | 82 / 124 | 66.1% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 72.1% | 33 / 49 | 67.3% | 72.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 53 / 162 | 32.7% | 34.9% | 265 / 685 | 38.7% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 9 / 19 | too few to rate | 66.1% | 65 / 98 | 66.3% | 66.1% |
| To the legs | 10 / 15 | too few to rate | 78.8% | 54 / 67 | 80.6% | 78.8% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Gibson has more cage time on record.