Jeremy Kimball vs. Marcos Rogerio de Lima
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jeremy Kimball
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 4 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 2 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 17 | 8 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.28 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 15 finish wins over 33 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Marcos Rogerio de Lima
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 11 | 7 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.99 · 11 tier-1/2 wins · 19 finish wins over 34 documented bouts
In the UFC: 6-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.7 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jeremy Kimball
Distance 71.9% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 6.2% (norm 8.8%) · Ground 21.9% (norm 10.6%)
Marcos Rogerio de Lima
Distance 73.3% (norm 79.2%) · Clinch 7.8% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 18.9% (norm 9.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jeremy Kimball
Head 84.4% (norm 78.5%) · Body 3.1% (norm 11.8%) · Legs 12.5% (norm 9.7%)
Marcos Rogerio de Lima
Head 69.2% (norm 79.2%) · Body 13.8% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 17.0% (norm 7.6%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Kimball L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | de Lima L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 19 / 46 | 41.3% | 41.5% | 250 / 461 | 54.2% | 40.1% |
| In the clinch | 2 / 4 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 37 / 49 | 75.5% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 9 / 14 | too few to rate | 72.9% | 88 / 119 | 73.9% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 21 / 54 | 38.9% | 39.2% | 219 / 435 | 50.3% | 39.0% |
| To the body | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 72.0% | 65 / 87 | 74.7% | 77.0% |
| To the legs | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 91 / 107 | 85.0% | 87.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 94 fighters · Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Kimball L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs de Lima L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 15 / 40 | 37.5% | 40.6% | 192 / 443 | 43.3% | 40.7% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.8% | 28 / 34 | 82.4% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 26 / 41 | 63.4% | 70.4% | 32 / 53 | 60.4% | 72.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 28 / 62 | 45.2% | 37.7% | 186 / 442 | 42.1% | 39.3% |
| To the body | 5 / 9 | too few to rate | 72.9% | 45 / 62 | 72.6% | 75.1% |
| To the legs | 8 / 10 | too few to rate | 83.1% | 21 / 26 | 80.8% | 84.4% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — de Lima has more cage time on record.