Jason Witt vs. Cole Williams
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jason Witt
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 5 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 2 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 15 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.46 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 28 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.2 wins over .500
Cole Williams
Full career not yet synced for Cole Williams — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jason Witt
Distance 74.5% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 7.0% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 18.5% (norm 8.1%)
Cole Williams
Distance 100.0% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 0.0% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jason Witt
Head 82.2% (norm 78.3%) · Body 14.0% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 3.8% (norm 8.0%)
Cole Williams
Head 81.8% (norm 78.3%) · Body 18.2% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 0.0% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Witt L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Williams L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 44 / 117 | 37.6% | 38.5% | 3 / 11 | too few to rate | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 6 / 11 | too few to rate | 67.8% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 20 / 29 | 69.0% | 67.0% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 51 / 129 | 39.5% | 36.4% | 3 / 9 | too few to rate | 36.4% |
| To the body | 13 / 22 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 0 / 2 | too few to rate | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 83.0% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 83.0% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 180 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Witt L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Williams L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 54 / 137 | 39.4% | 39.1% | 13 / 21 | too few to rate | 39.1% |
| In the clinch | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 68.9% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 24 / 29 | 82.8% | 68.0% | 38 / 46 | 82.6% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 81 / 163 | 49.7% | 35.6% | 42 / 57 | 73.7% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 0 / 5 | too few to rate | 69.6% | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 2 / 5 | too few to rate | 82.2% | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 82.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Witt has more cage time on record.