Jason Tan vs. Dong Hyun Kim
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jason Tan
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 5 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.32 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 3 finish wins over 8 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
Dong Hyun Kim
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 13 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 9 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.42 · 13 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 28 documented bouts
In the UFC: 7-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.8 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jason Tan
Distance 96.3% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 3.7% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.1%)
Dong Hyun Kim
Distance 54.3% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 12.3% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 33.4% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jason Tan
Head 66.7% (norm 78.2%) · Body 0.0% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 33.3% (norm 8.4%)
Dong Hyun Kim
Head 85.5% (norm 78.2%) · Body 6.6% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 7.9% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Tan L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Kim L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 8 / 26 | 30.8% | 38.6% | 155 / 470 | 33.0% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 67.8% | 84 / 106 | 79.2% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 185 / 289 | 64.0% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 1 / 18 | too few to rate | 37.2% | 327 / 740 | 44.2% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 44 / 57 | 77.2% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 53 / 68 | 77.9% | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Tan L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Kim L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 8 / 18 | too few to rate | 39.0% | 201 / 646 | 31.1% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 21 / 22 | too few to rate | 68.9% | 142 / 214 | 66.4% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 57 / 66 | 86.4% | 68.0% | 34 / 50 | 68.0% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 83 / 103 | 80.6% | 35.6% | 189 / 636 | 29.7% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 3 / 3 | too few to rate | 69.6% | 109 / 166 | 65.7% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 79 / 108 | 73.1% | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Kim has more cage time on record.