Jason Gilliam vs.
Jamie Varner
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Jason Gilliam
Full career not yet synced for Jason Gilliam — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -2.5 wins over .500
Jamie Varner
Full career not yet synced for Jamie Varner — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 2-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.9 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jason Gilliam
Distance 55.6% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 22.2% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 22.2% (norm 8.1%)
Jamie Varner
Distance 70.2% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 9.8% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 20.0% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jason Gilliam
Head 66.7% (norm 78.2%) · Body 33.3% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 0.0% (norm 8.4%)
Jamie Varner
Head 86.7% (norm 78.2%) · Body 10.9% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 2.3% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Gilliam L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Varner L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 2 / 5 | too few to rate | 38.6% | 159 / 449 | 35.4% | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 67.8% | 32 / 63 | 50.8% | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 0 / 2 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 52 / 128 | 40.6% | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 0 / 6 | too few to rate | 37.2% | 183 / 555 | 33.0% | 35.0% |
| To the body | 3 / 3 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 49 / 70 | 70.0% | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 11 / 15 | too few to rate | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Gilliam L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Varner L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 39.0% | 151 / 401 | 37.7% | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.9% | 20 / 42 | 47.6% | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 8 / 16 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 34 / 49 | 69.4% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 8 / 17 | too few to rate | 35.6% | 142 / 413 | 34.4% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 69.6% | 25 / 37 | 67.6% | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 38 / 42 | 90.5% | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Varner has more cage time on record.