Jamie Mullarkey vs.
Khama Worthy
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Jamie Mullarkey
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 7 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.71 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 13 finish wins over 27 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.7 wins over .500
Khama Worthy
Full career not yet synced for Khama Worthy — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 2-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.2 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jamie Mullarkey
Distance 89.8% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 6.5% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 3.6% (norm 8.0%)
Khama Worthy
Distance 94.3% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 1.6% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 4.2% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jamie Mullarkey
Head 71.5% (norm 78.2%) · Body 15.1% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 13.4% (norm 7.9%)
Khama Worthy
Head 60.9% (norm 78.2%) · Body 15.6% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 23.4% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Mullarkey L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Worthy L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 429 / 963 | 44.5% | 37.9% | 86 / 181 | 47.5% | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 46 / 70 | 65.7% | 67.3% | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 25 / 39 | 64.1% | 69.1% | 6 / 8 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 259 / 766 | 33.8% | 35.0% | 37 / 117 | 31.6% | 35.0% |
| To the body | 109 / 162 | 67.3% | 69.1% | 22 / 30 | 73.3% | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 132 / 144 | 91.7% | 81.9% | 34 / 45 | 75.6% | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Mullarkey L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Worthy L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 428 / 1014 | 42.2% | 38.9% | 73 / 150 | 48.7% | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 41 / 59 | 69.5% | 68.6% | 8 / 12 | too few to rate | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 52 / 70 | 74.3% | 68.0% | 18 / 23 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 347 / 893 | 38.9% | 35.1% | 66 / 143 | 46.2% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 101 / 169 | 59.8% | 68.1% | 13 / 16 | too few to rate | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 73 / 81 | 90.1% | 81.5% | 20 / 26 | 76.9% | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Mullarkey has more cage time on record.