Jamey-Lyn Horth vs. Hailey Cowan
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jamey-Lyn Horth
Full career not yet synced for Jamey-Lyn Horth — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
Hailey Cowan
Full career not yet synced for Hailey Cowan — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jamey-Lyn Horth
Distance 87.5% (norm 87.5%) · Clinch 12.1% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 0.4% (norm 4.5%)
Hailey Cowan
Distance 85.5% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 11.5% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 3.0% (norm 7.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jamey-Lyn Horth
Head 68.4% (norm 78.1%) · Body 22.7% (norm 14.5%) · Legs 8.8% (norm 7.6%)
Hailey Cowan
Head 72.5% (norm 75.5%) · Body 23.0% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 4.5% (norm 8.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Horth L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med | Cowan L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 273 / 643 | 42.5% | 40.3% | 80 / 230 | 34.8% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 74 / 89 | 83.1% | 73.9% | 24 / 31 | 77.4% | 74.3% |
| On the ground | 3 / 3 | too few to rate | 74.4% | 6 / 8 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 185 / 503 | 36.8% | 36.0% | 64 / 195 | 32.8% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 116 / 167 | 69.5% | 69.5% | 37 / 62 | 59.7% | 71.1% |
| To the legs | 49 / 65 | 75.4% | 82.3% | 9 / 12 | too few to rate | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Flyweight: 47 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Horth L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med | vs Cowan L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 202 / 614 | 32.9% | 39.0% | 94 / 177 | 53.1% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 37 / 55 | 67.3% | 73.8% | 41 / 47 | 87.2% | 75.0% |
| On the ground | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 73.4% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 146 / 533 | 27.4% | 35.0% | 77 / 151 | 51.0% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 67 / 96 | 69.8% | 69.0% | 48 / 59 | 81.4% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 30 / 45 | 66.7% | 78.7% | 12 / 16 | too few to rate | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Horth has more cage time on record.