James Head vs.
Nick Ring
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
James Head
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.75 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 13 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
Nick Ring
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 10 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.11 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 8 finish wins over 18 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
James Head
Distance 71.6% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 26.0% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 2.4% (norm 8.1%)
Nick Ring
Distance 89.1% (norm 79.4%) · Clinch 6.2% (norm 9.1%) · Ground 4.8% (norm 10.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
James Head
Head 79.8% (norm 78.2%) · Body 18.3% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 1.9% (norm 8.4%)
Nick Ring
Head 68.4% (norm 78.0%) · Body 12.0% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 19.6% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Head L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Ring L/A | Acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 54 / 149 | 36.2% | 38.6% | 246 / 651 | 37.8% | 40.5% |
| In the clinch | 43 / 54 | 79.6% | 67.8% | 36 / 45 | 80.0% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 30 / 35 | 85.7% | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 66 / 166 | 39.8% | 37.2% | 141 / 500 | 28.2% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 32 / 38 | 84.2% | 70.7% | 62 / 88 | 70.5% | 71.7% |
| To the legs | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 109 / 143 | 76.2% | 83.3% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Middleweight: 174 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Head L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Ring L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 70 / 160 | 43.8% | 39.0% | 249 / 746 | 33.4% | 39.5% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 19 | too few to rate | 68.9% | 47 / 64 | 73.4% | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 34 / 48 | 70.8% | 68.0% | 12 / 17 | too few to rate | 69.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 59 / 151 | 39.1% | 35.6% | 203 / 680 | 29.9% | 37.9% |
| To the body | 22 / 32 | 68.8% | 69.6% | 53 / 79 | 67.1% | 71.3% |
| To the legs | 33 / 44 | 75.0% | 82.1% | 52 / 68 | 76.5% | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Ring has more cage time on record.