Jamall Emmers vs. Vince Cachero
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jamall Emmers
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 5 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 5 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.9 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 30 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Vince Cachero
Full career not yet synced for Vince Cachero — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jamall Emmers
Distance 87.4% (norm 85.9%) · Clinch 6.8% (norm 6.0%) · Ground 5.9% (norm 6.5%)
Vince Cachero
Distance 85.9% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 12.1% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 2.0% (norm 6.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jamall Emmers
Head 70.0% (norm 77.5%) · Body 20.2% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 9.8% (norm 7.9%)
Vince Cachero
Head 82.3% (norm 77.5%) · Body 10.6% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 7.1% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Emmers L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Cachero L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 353 / 802 | 44.0% | 40.5% | 72 / 170 | 42.4% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 47 / 62 | 75.8% | 70.5% | 16 / 24 | too few to rate | 69.0% |
| On the ground | 39 / 54 | 72.2% | 69.3% | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 249 / 643 | 38.7% | 37.1% | 66 / 163 | 40.5% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 131 / 185 | 70.8% | 68.0% | 13 / 21 | too few to rate | 66.9% |
| To the legs | 59 / 90 | 65.6% | 80.3% | 12 / 14 | too few to rate | 79.2% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 127 fighters · Bantamweight: 121 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Emmers L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Cachero L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 279 / 720 | 38.8% | 39.3% | 100 / 210 | 47.6% | 39.4% |
| In the clinch | 31 / 51 | 60.8% | 70.3% | 28 / 37 | 75.7% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 13 / 15 | too few to rate | 69.4% | 52 / 70 | 74.3% | 72.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 197 / 588 | 33.5% | 35.9% | 111 / 232 | 47.8% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 58 / 96 | 60.4% | 68.0% | 51 / 63 | 81.0% | 66.1% |
| To the legs | 68 / 102 | 66.7% | 81.5% | 18 / 22 | too few to rate | 78.8% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Emmers has more cage time on record.