Jamall Emmers vs.
Dennis Buzukja
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Jamall Emmers
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 5 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 5 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.9 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 30 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.4 wins over .500
Dennis Buzukja
Full career not yet synced for Dennis Buzukja — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jamall Emmers
Distance 87.4% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 6.9% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 5.7% (norm 6.5%)
Dennis Buzukja
Distance 93.2% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 2.6% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 4.2% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jamall Emmers
Head 70.1% (norm 77.4%) · Body 20.5% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 9.4% (norm 7.8%)
Dennis Buzukja
Head 74.4% (norm 77.4%) · Body 16.5% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 9.1% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Emmers L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Buzukja L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 339 / 777 | 43.6% | 40.9% | 226 / 532 | 42.5% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 46 / 61 | 75.4% | 70.8% | 10 / 15 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 37 / 51 | 72.5% | 69.2% | 9 / 24 | too few to rate | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 239 / 623 | 38.4% | 37.2% | 149 / 425 | 35.1% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 129 / 182 | 70.9% | 68.2% | 55 / 94 | 58.5% | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 54 / 84 | 64.3% | 80.7% | 41 / 52 | 78.8% | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Emmers L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Buzukja L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 265 / 695 | 38.1% | 39.2% | 209 / 464 | 45.0% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 31 / 49 | 63.3% | 70.3% | 18 / 23 | too few to rate | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 13 / 15 | too few to rate | 69.4% | 23 / 29 | 79.3% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 191 / 571 | 33.5% | 35.9% | 170 / 401 | 42.4% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 57 / 94 | 60.6% | 67.9% | 43 / 77 | 55.8% | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 61 / 94 | 64.9% | 81.5% | 37 / 38 | 97.4% | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Emmers has more cage time on record.