Hyder Amil vs.
Jamall Emmers
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Hyder Amil
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 3 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 3 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 1 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.61 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Jamall Emmers
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 5 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 5 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.9 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 30 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.4 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Hyder Amil
Distance 88.2% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 7.0% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 4.8% (norm 6.5%)
Jamall Emmers
Distance 87.4% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 6.9% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 5.7% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Hyder Amil
Head 75.1% (norm 77.4%) · Body 14.1% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 10.7% (norm 7.8%)
Jamall Emmers
Head 70.1% (norm 77.4%) · Body 20.5% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 9.4% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Amil L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Emmers L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 264 / 518 | 51.0% | 40.9% | 339 / 777 | 43.6% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 25 / 41 | 61.0% | 70.8% | 46 / 61 | 75.4% | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 20 / 28 | 71.4% | 69.2% | 37 / 51 | 72.5% | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 196 / 441 | 44.4% | 37.2% | 239 / 623 | 38.4% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 67 / 83 | 80.7% | 68.2% | 129 / 182 | 70.9% | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 46 / 63 | 73.0% | 80.7% | 54 / 84 | 64.3% | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Amil L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Emmers L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 179 / 379 | 47.2% | 39.2% | 265 / 695 | 38.1% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 17 / 26 | 65.4% | 70.3% | 31 / 49 | 63.3% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 14 / 21 | too few to rate | 69.4% | 13 / 15 | too few to rate | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 146 / 345 | 42.3% | 35.9% | 191 / 571 | 33.5% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 49 / 65 | 75.4% | 67.9% | 57 / 94 | 60.6% | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 15 / 16 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 61 / 94 | 64.9% | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Emmers has more cage time on record.