Hyder Amil vs. Fernie Garcia
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Hyder Amil
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 3 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 3 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 1 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.61 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Fernie Garcia
Full career not yet synced for Fernie Garcia — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Hyder Amil
Distance 88.2% (norm 85.9%) · Clinch 7.0% (norm 6.0%) · Ground 4.8% (norm 6.5%)
Fernie Garcia
Distance 97.6% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 1.4% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 1.0% (norm 6.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Hyder Amil
Head 75.1% (norm 77.5%) · Body 14.1% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 10.7% (norm 7.9%)
Fernie Garcia
Head 84.9% (norm 77.5%) · Body 7.9% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 7.2% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Amil L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Garcia L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 264 / 518 | 51.0% | 40.5% | 95 / 285 | 33.3% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 25 / 41 | 61.0% | 70.5% | 1 / 4 | too few to rate | 69.0% |
| On the ground | 20 / 28 | 71.4% | 69.3% | 3 / 3 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 196 / 441 | 44.4% | 37.1% | 68 / 248 | 27.4% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 67 / 83 | 80.7% | 68.0% | 14 / 23 | too few to rate | 66.9% |
| To the legs | 46 / 63 | 73.0% | 80.3% | 17 / 21 | too few to rate | 79.2% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 127 fighters · Bantamweight: 121 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Amil L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Garcia L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 179 / 379 | 47.2% | 39.3% | 151 / 322 | 46.9% | 39.4% |
| In the clinch | 17 / 26 | 65.4% | 70.3% | 6 / 12 | too few to rate | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 14 / 21 | too few to rate | 69.4% | 34 / 44 | 77.3% | 72.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 146 / 345 | 42.3% | 35.9% | 109 / 267 | 40.8% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 49 / 65 | 75.4% | 68.0% | 49 / 65 | 75.4% | 66.1% |
| To the legs | 15 / 16 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 33 / 46 | 71.7% | 78.8% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Amil has more cage time on record.