Herbert Burns vs.
Daniel Pineda
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Herbert Burns
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.15 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.7 wins over .500
Daniel Pineda
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 12 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 8 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 14 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.71 · 14 tier-1/2 wins · 28 finish wins over 47 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.6 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Herbert Burns
Distance 83.2% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 7.6% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 9.1% (norm 6.5%)
Daniel Pineda
Distance 73.5% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 4.3% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 22.3% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Herbert Burns
Head 73.6% (norm 77.4%) · Body 19.8% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 6.6% (norm 7.8%)
Daniel Pineda
Head 78.4% (norm 77.4%) · Body 10.9% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 10.7% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Burns L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Pineda L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 48 / 164 | 29.3% | 40.9% | 213 / 535 | 39.8% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 12 / 15 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 23 / 31 | 74.2% | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 11 / 18 | too few to rate | 69.2% | 125 / 162 | 77.2% | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 38 / 145 | 26.2% | 37.2% | 242 / 571 | 42.4% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 24 / 39 | 61.5% | 68.2% | 54 / 79 | 68.4% | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 9 / 13 | too few to rate | 80.7% | 65 / 78 | 83.3% | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Burns L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Pineda L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 94 / 196 | 48.0% | 39.2% | 307 / 605 | 50.7% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 14 / 18 | too few to rate | 70.3% | 51 / 69 | 73.9% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 86 / 117 | 73.5% | 69.4% | 54 / 86 | 62.8% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 139 / 266 | 52.3% | 35.9% | 267 / 577 | 46.3% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 36 / 43 | 83.7% | 67.9% | 104 / 132 | 78.8% | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 19 / 22 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 41 / 51 | 80.4% | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Pineda has more cage time on record.