Guangyou Ning vs.
Royston Wee
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Guangyou Ning
Full career not yet synced for Guangyou Ning — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Royston Wee
Full career not yet synced for Royston Wee — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Guangyou Ning
Distance 85.5% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 4.3% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 10.3% (norm 6.5%)
Royston Wee
Distance 75.3% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 6.8% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 17.8% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Guangyou Ning
Head 68.9% (norm 77.4%) · Body 12.3% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 18.8% (norm 7.8%)
Royston Wee
Head 56.2% (norm 77.4%) · Body 12.3% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 31.5% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Ning L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Wee L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 111 / 300 | 37.0% | 40.9% | 30 / 55 | 54.5% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 15 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 25 / 36 | 69.4% | 69.2% | 10 / 13 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 77 / 242 | 31.8% | 37.2% | 16 / 41 | 39.0% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 26 / 43 | 60.5% | 68.2% | 9 / 9 | too few to rate | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 43 / 66 | 65.2% | 80.7% | 19 / 23 | too few to rate | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Ning L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Wee L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 80 / 236 | 33.9% | 39.2% | 66 / 144 | 45.8% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 13 / 20 | too few to rate | 70.3% | 8 / 14 | too few to rate | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 12 / 16 | too few to rate | 69.4% | 24 / 37 | 64.9% | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 40 / 171 | 23.4% | 35.9% | 71 / 157 | 45.2% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 26 / 45 | 57.8% | 67.9% | 15 / 23 | too few to rate | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 39 / 56 | 69.6% | 81.5% | 12 / 15 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Ning has more cage time on record.