Gabriel Gonzaga vs.
Konstantin Erokhin
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Gabriel Gonzaga
Full career not yet synced for Gabriel Gonzaga — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 4-8 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.1 wins over .500
Konstantin Erokhin
Full career not yet synced for Konstantin Erokhin — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Gabriel Gonzaga
Distance 67.7% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 9.8% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 22.5% (norm 9.3%)
Konstantin Erokhin
Distance 88.5% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 11.5% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 9.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Gabriel Gonzaga
Head 78.0% (norm 79.2%) · Body 9.2% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 12.8% (norm 7.6%)
Konstantin Erokhin
Head 87.4% (norm 79.2%) · Body 10.3% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 2.3% (norm 7.6%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Gonzaga L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med | Erokhin L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 156 / 440 | 35.5% | 40.1% | 25 / 77 | 32.5% | 40.1% |
| In the clinch | 43 / 64 | 67.2% | 70.6% | 7 / 10 | too few to rate | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 94 / 146 | 64.4% | 70.2% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 186 / 507 | 36.7% | 38.9% | 23 / 76 | 30.3% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 42 / 60 | 70.0% | 76.8% | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 76.8% |
| To the legs | 65 / 83 | 78.3% | 87.8% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 87.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Gonzaga L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med | vs Erokhin L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 189 / 643 | 29.4% | 40.7% | 21 / 54 | 38.9% | 40.7% |
| In the clinch | 92 / 130 | 70.8% | 70.6% | 4 / 10 | too few to rate | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 90 / 133 | 67.7% | 72.0% | 30 / 40 | 75.0% | 72.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 310 / 820 | 37.8% | 38.8% | 37 / 82 | 45.1% | 38.8% |
| To the body | 33 / 50 | 66.0% | 75.1% | 9 / 11 | too few to rate | 75.1% |
| To the legs | 28 / 36 | 77.8% | 84.4% | 9 / 11 | too few to rate | 84.4% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Gonzaga has more cage time on record.