Ezra Elliott vs.
Damien Anderson
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Ezra Elliott
Full career not yet synced for Ezra Elliott — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Damien Anderson
Full career not yet synced for Damien Anderson — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Ezra Elliott
Distance 54.5% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 9.1% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 36.4% (norm 6.5%)
Damien Anderson
Distance 40.0% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 20.0% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 40.0% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Ezra Elliott
Head 72.7% (norm 77.4%) · Body 18.2% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 9.1% (norm 7.8%)
Damien Anderson
Head 80.0% (norm 77.4%) · Body 10.0% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 10.0% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Elliott L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Anderson L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 2 / 6 | too few to rate | 40.9% | 2 / 8 | too few to rate | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 69.2% | 2 / 8 | too few to rate | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 4 / 8 | too few to rate | 37.2% | 5 / 16 | too few to rate | 37.2% |
| To the body | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 68.2% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 80.7% | 0 / 2 | too few to rate | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Elliott L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Anderson L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 2 / 8 | too few to rate | 39.2% | 2 / 6 | too few to rate | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 70.3% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 2 / 8 | too few to rate | 69.4% | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 5 / 16 | too few to rate | 35.9% | 4 / 8 | too few to rate | 35.9% |
| To the body | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 67.9% | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 0 / 2 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Elliott has more cage time on record.