Evan Dunham vs. Herbert Burns
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Evan Dunham
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 11 | 9 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.92 · 11 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 28 documented bouts
In the UFC: 7-9 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.0 wins over .500
Herbert Burns
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.15 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.7 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Evan Dunham
Distance 89.9% (norm 83.1%) · Clinch 7.0% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 3.2% (norm 8.0%)
Herbert Burns
Distance 83.2% (norm 85.9%) · Clinch 7.6% (norm 6.0%) · Ground 9.1% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Evan Dunham
Head 91.1% (norm 78.0%) · Body 7.1% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 1.9% (norm 8.0%)
Herbert Burns
Head 73.6% (norm 77.5%) · Body 19.8% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 6.6% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Dunham L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Burns L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 1024 / 2811 | 36.4% | 38.3% | 48 / 164 | 29.3% | 40.5% |
| In the clinch | 142 / 218 | 65.1% | 67.5% | 12 / 15 | too few to rate | 70.5% |
| On the ground | 62 / 99 | 62.6% | 68.8% | 11 / 18 | too few to rate | 69.3% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 1039 / 2849 | 36.5% | 35.1% | 38 / 145 | 26.2% | 37.1% |
| To the body | 137 / 221 | 62.0% | 69.1% | 24 / 39 | 61.5% | 68.0% |
| To the legs | 52 / 58 | 89.7% | 81.8% | 9 / 13 | too few to rate | 80.3% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 204 fighters · Featherweight: 127 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Dunham L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Burns L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 639 / 1840 | 34.7% | 38.8% | 94 / 196 | 48.0% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 122 / 202 | 60.4% | 68.6% | 14 / 18 | too few to rate | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 55 / 87 | 63.2% | 68.0% | 86 / 117 | 73.5% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 557 / 1767 | 31.5% | 35.2% | 139 / 266 | 52.3% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 160 / 232 | 69.0% | 68.2% | 36 / 43 | 83.7% | 68.0% |
| To the legs | 99 / 130 | 76.2% | 81.5% | 19 / 22 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Dunham has more cage time on record.