Eliot Marshall vs.
Jules Bruchez
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Eliot Marshall
Full career not yet synced for Eliot Marshall — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Jules Bruchez
Full career not yet synced for Jules Bruchez — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Eliot Marshall
Distance 93.2% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 4.6% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 2.2% (norm 10.4%)
Jules Bruchez
Distance 50.0% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 50.0% (norm 8.6%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 10.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Eliot Marshall
Head 87.5% (norm 79.2%) · Body 7.5% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 5.1% (norm 9.7%)
Jules Bruchez
Head 50.0% (norm 79.2%) · Body 0.0% (norm 11.7%) · Legs 50.0% (norm 9.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Marshall L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | Bruchez L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 105 / 424 | 24.8% | 41.4% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 41.4% |
| In the clinch | 13 / 21 | too few to rate | 70.9% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 5 / 10 | too few to rate | 72.3% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 72.3% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 81 / 398 | 20.4% | 38.9% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 38.9% |
| To the body | 22 / 34 | 64.7% | 71.9% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 71.9% |
| To the legs | 20 / 23 | too few to rate | 81.8% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 81.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Light Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Marshall L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs Bruchez L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 94 / 352 | 26.7% | 40.4% | 5 / 11 | too few to rate | 40.4% |
| In the clinch | 19 / 41 | 46.3% | 68.7% | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 39 / 81 | 48.1% | 70.4% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 70.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 86 / 380 | 22.6% | 37.5% | 8 / 15 | too few to rate | 37.5% |
| To the body | 18 / 28 | 64.3% | 72.3% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 72.3% |
| To the legs | 48 / 66 | 72.7% | 83.0% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 83.0% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Marshall has more cage time on record.