Dennis Hallman vs. John Howard
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Dennis Hallman
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 11 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 39 | 15 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.72 · 11 tier-1/2 wins · 42 finish wins over 73 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.8 wins over .500
John Howard
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 10 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 18 | 9 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.5 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 17 finish wins over 47 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Dennis Hallman
Distance 43.5% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 18.2% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 38.3% (norm 8.1%)
John Howard
Distance 68.0% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 23.0% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 9.1% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Dennis Hallman
Head 79.4% (norm 78.3%) · Body 12.4% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 8.1% (norm 8.0%)
John Howard
Head 66.4% (norm 78.3%) · Body 13.2% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 20.4% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Hallman L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Howard L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 23 / 91 | 25.3% | 38.5% | 222 / 494 | 44.9% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 20 / 38 | 52.6% | 67.8% | 99 / 167 | 59.3% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 51 / 80 | 63.8% | 67.0% | 48 / 66 | 72.7% | 67.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 63 / 166 | 38.0% | 36.4% | 175 / 483 | 36.2% | 36.4% |
| To the body | 19 / 26 | 73.1% | 70.7% | 68 / 96 | 70.8% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 12 / 17 | too few to rate | 83.0% | 126 / 148 | 85.1% | 83.0% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 180 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Hallman L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Howard L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 51 / 127 | 40.2% | 39.1% | 311 / 772 | 40.3% | 39.1% |
| In the clinch | 33 / 44 | 75.0% | 68.9% | 128 / 175 | 73.1% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 80 / 120 | 66.7% | 68.0% | 90 / 137 | 65.7% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 113 / 227 | 49.8% | 35.6% | 262 / 742 | 35.3% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 37 / 43 | 86.0% | 69.6% | 152 / 198 | 76.8% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 14 / 21 | too few to rate | 82.2% | 115 / 144 | 79.9% | 82.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Howard has more cage time on record.