Dennis Hallman vs.
Frank Trigg
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Dennis Hallman
Full career not yet synced for Dennis Hallman — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 4-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.8 wins over .500
Frank Trigg
Full career not yet synced for Frank Trigg — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.1 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Dennis Hallman
Distance 43.5% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 18.2% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 38.3% (norm 8.1%)
Frank Trigg
Distance 40.1% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 14.6% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 45.2% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Dennis Hallman
Head 79.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 12.4% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 8.1% (norm 8.4%)
Frank Trigg
Head 87.9% (norm 78.2%) · Body 10.8% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 1.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Hallman L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Trigg L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 23 / 91 | 25.3% | 38.6% | 14 / 63 | 22.2% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 20 / 38 | 52.6% | 67.8% | 15 / 23 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 51 / 80 | 63.8% | 67.2% | 45 / 71 | 63.4% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 63 / 166 | 38.0% | 37.2% | 63 / 138 | 45.7% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 19 / 26 | 73.1% | 70.7% | 10 / 17 | too few to rate | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 12 / 17 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Hallman L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Trigg L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 51 / 127 | 40.2% | 39.0% | 19 / 71 | 26.8% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 33 / 44 | 75.0% | 68.9% | 4 / 11 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 80 / 120 | 66.7% | 68.0% | 41 / 49 | 83.7% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 113 / 227 | 49.8% | 35.6% | 52 / 109 | 47.7% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 37 / 43 | 86.0% | 69.6% | 6 / 16 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 14 / 21 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Hallman has more cage time on record.