Dennis Hallman vs. Frank Trigg
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Dennis Hallman
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 11 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 39 | 15 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.72 · 11 tier-1/2 wins · 42 finish wins over 73 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.8 wins over .500
Frank Trigg
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 19 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.57 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 16 finish wins over 30 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.1 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Dennis Hallman
Distance 43.5% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 18.2% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 38.3% (norm 8.1%)
Frank Trigg
Distance 40.1% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 14.6% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 45.2% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Dennis Hallman
Head 79.4% (norm 78.3%) · Body 12.4% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 8.1% (norm 8.0%)
Frank Trigg
Head 87.9% (norm 78.3%) · Body 10.8% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 1.3% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Hallman L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Trigg L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 23 / 91 | 25.3% | 38.5% | 14 / 63 | 22.2% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 20 / 38 | 52.6% | 67.8% | 15 / 23 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 51 / 80 | 63.8% | 67.0% | 45 / 71 | 63.4% | 67.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 63 / 166 | 38.0% | 36.4% | 63 / 138 | 45.7% | 36.4% |
| To the body | 19 / 26 | 73.1% | 70.7% | 10 / 17 | too few to rate | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 12 / 17 | too few to rate | 83.0% | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 83.0% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 180 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Hallman L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Trigg L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 51 / 127 | 40.2% | 39.1% | 19 / 71 | 26.8% | 39.1% |
| In the clinch | 33 / 44 | 75.0% | 68.9% | 4 / 11 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 80 / 120 | 66.7% | 68.0% | 41 / 49 | 83.7% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 113 / 227 | 49.8% | 35.6% | 52 / 109 | 47.7% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 37 / 43 | 86.0% | 69.6% | 6 / 16 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 14 / 21 | too few to rate | 82.2% | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 82.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Hallman has more cage time on record.