Davey Grant vs.
Daniel Marcos
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Davey Grant
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 7 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 9 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.0 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 13 finish wins over 26 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.1 wins over .500
Daniel Marcos
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.49 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 20 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Davey Grant
Distance 92.8% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 4.2% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 3.0% (norm 6.5%)
Daniel Marcos
Distance 89.5% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 8.9% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 1.6% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Davey Grant
Head 63.2% (norm 77.4%) · Body 22.6% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 14.3% (norm 8.4%)
Daniel Marcos
Head 70.0% (norm 77.4%) · Body 17.5% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 12.4% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Grant L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Marcos L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 951 / 2169 | 43.8% | 39.0% | 341 / 663 | 51.4% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 63 / 98 | 64.3% | 68.7% | 58 / 66 | 87.9% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 49 / 70 | 70.0% | 70.2% | 11 / 12 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 429 / 1476 | 29.1% | 34.9% | 253 / 519 | 48.7% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 347 / 527 | 65.8% | 66.8% | 81 / 130 | 62.3% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 287 / 334 | 85.9% | 79.4% | 76 / 92 | 82.6% | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Grant L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Marcos L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 660 / 1534 | 43.0% | 39.3% | 326 / 784 | 41.6% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 54 / 74 | 73.0% | 70.4% | 9 / 22 | too few to rate | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 55 / 94 | 58.5% | 72.4% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 457 / 1272 | 35.9% | 34.9% | 179 / 579 | 30.9% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 183 / 281 | 65.1% | 66.0% | 61 / 108 | 56.5% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 129 / 149 | 86.6% | 79.1% | 95 / 119 | 79.8% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Grant has more cage time on record.