Daniel Roberts vs. John Howard
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Daniel Roberts
Full career not yet synced for Daniel Roberts — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.9 wins over .500
John Howard
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 10 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 18 | 9 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.5 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 17 finish wins over 47 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Daniel Roberts
Distance 88.3% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 4.2% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 7.5% (norm 8.1%)
John Howard
Distance 68.0% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 23.0% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 9.1% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Daniel Roberts
Head 83.3% (norm 78.3%) · Body 10.0% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 6.7% (norm 8.0%)
John Howard
Head 66.4% (norm 78.3%) · Body 13.2% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 20.4% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Roberts L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Howard L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 34 / 212 | 16.0% | 38.5% | 222 / 494 | 44.9% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 7 / 10 | too few to rate | 67.8% | 99 / 167 | 59.3% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 8 / 18 | too few to rate | 67.0% | 48 / 66 | 72.7% | 67.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 26 / 200 | 13.0% | 36.4% | 175 / 483 | 36.2% | 36.4% |
| To the body | 16 / 24 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 68 / 96 | 70.8% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 7 / 16 | too few to rate | 83.0% | 126 / 148 | 85.1% | 83.0% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 180 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Roberts L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Howard L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 67 / 165 | 40.6% | 39.1% | 311 / 772 | 40.3% | 39.1% |
| In the clinch | 27 / 44 | 61.4% | 68.9% | 128 / 175 | 73.1% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 58 / 73 | 79.5% | 68.0% | 90 / 137 | 65.7% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 76 / 197 | 38.6% | 35.6% | 262 / 742 | 35.3% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 40 / 48 | 83.3% | 69.6% | 152 / 198 | 76.8% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 36 / 37 | 97.3% | 82.2% | 115 / 144 | 79.9% | 82.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Howard has more cage time on record.