Skip to content

Dan Moret vs. Gilbert Burns

UFC 0-3-0 vs. 15-10-0

Tale of the tape

Green = edge on that line
0-3-0
UFC record
15-10-0
Lightweight
Division (benchmark)
Welterweight
39
AgeΔ 1 yrs
40
6'0"
HeightΔ 2"
5'10"
73"
ReachΔ 2"
71"
Southpaw
Stance
Orthodox
87.7
Layoff (months)Δ 81.6 mo
6.1
LLL
Last 5 (newest first)
LLLLL

The read

Stats 25%+ off the division median
Gilbert Burns hunts takedowns — 2.04 per 15 minutes, vs a 1.31 Welterweight norm.
Opponents land 51% of their head shots on Dan Moret, vs a 35% Lightweight norm — a hole in the guard.
Dan Moret owns the mat — in control 27% of cage time, vs a 19% Lightweight norm.

Level of competition

Full-career record by tier of opposition

Dan Moret

Full career not yet synced for Dan Moret — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).

In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500

Gilbert Burns

Competition tierWL
Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin 1510
Tier 3 — regional circuit 70

Tier-weighted record quality: 1.21 · 15 tier-1/2 wins · 15 finish wins over 32 documented bouts

In the UFC: 9-10 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +4.2 wins over .500

Striking

Career totals · norms = own-division medians

Significant strikes — landed & absorbed

962.67/min · norm 3.44
Sig. strikes landed
9743.16/min · norm 3.17
1283.56/min · norm 3.38
Sig. strikes absorbed lower is better
11353.68/min · norm 3.08
43.8%norm 43.65%
Striking accuracy
48.1%norm 44.75%
43.4%norm 56.3%
Striking defense
52.5%norm 55.25%
00.00/15 · norm 0.25
Knockdowns
40.19/15 · norm 0.38

Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)

Dan Moret

Distance 71.7% (norm 83.1%) · Clinch 24.2% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 4.1% (norm 8.0%)

Gilbert Burns

Distance 84.3% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 7.1% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 8.5% (norm 8.1%)

What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)

Dan Moret

Head 72.6% (norm 78.0%) · Body 18.3% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 9.1% (norm 8.0%)

Gilbert Burns

Head 74.4% (norm 78.3%) · Body 13.8% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 11.9% (norm 8.0%)

Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone

Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.

Zone Moret L/AAccLightweight med Burns L/AAccWelterweight med
BY POSITION
At distance 56 / 157 35.7% 38.3% 737 / 1708 43.1% 38.5%
In the clinch 33 / 53 62.3% 67.5% 99 / 144 68.8% 67.8%
On the ground 7 / 9 too few to rate 68.8% 138 / 173 79.8% 67.0%
BY TARGET
To the head 50 / 159 31.4% 35.1% 571 / 1506 37.9% 36.4%
To the body 28 / 40 70.0% 69.1% 216 / 279 77.4% 70.7%
To the legs 18 / 20 too few to rate 81.8% 187 / 240 77.9% 83.0%

Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 204 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).

What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man

Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.

Zone vs Moret L/AOpp accLightweight med vs Burns L/AOpp accWelterweight med
BY POSITION
At distance 72 / 140 51.4% 38.8% 957 / 2144 44.6% 39.1%
In the clinch 31 / 47 66.0% 68.6% 89 / 121 73.6% 68.9%
On the ground 25 / 39 64.1% 68.0% 89 / 126 70.6% 68.0%
BY TARGET
To the head 96 / 190 50.5% 35.2% 766 / 1896 40.4% 35.6%
To the body 29 / 33 87.9% 68.2% 196 / 298 65.8% 69.6%
To the legs 3 / 3 too few to rate 81.5% 173 / 197 87.8% 82.2%

Grappling

Takedowns, control, submissions vs. division norm
327.3% acc · 1.25/15 · norm 1.34
Takedowns landed
4235.6% acc · 2.04/15 · norm 1.31
545.5% def · norm 63.7%
Takedowns stopped
2253.7% def · norm 63.9%
9:4527.1% of cage time · norm 18.95%
Control time
70:2122.8% of cage time · norm 18.5%
14:356:04 per 15 · norm 2:50
Time under control lower is better
36:521:47 per 15 · norm 3:15
10.42/15 · norm 0.48
Submission attempts
90.44/15 · norm 0.44

Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Burns has more cage time on record.