Dan Christison vs.
Brad Imes
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Dan Christison
Full career not yet synced for Dan Christison — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.5 wins over .500
Brad Imes
Full career not yet synced for Brad Imes — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.3 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Dan Christison
Distance 70.0% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 26.2% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 3.9% (norm 9.3%)
Brad Imes
Distance 68.9% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 21.4% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 9.7% (norm 9.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Dan Christison
Head 72.5% (norm 79.2%) · Body 10.3% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 17.2% (norm 7.6%)
Brad Imes
Head 90.9% (norm 79.2%) · Body 8.3% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 0.8% (norm 7.6%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Christison L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med | Imes L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 78 / 163 | 47.9% | 40.1% | 68 / 257 | 26.5% | 40.1% |
| In the clinch | 36 / 61 | 59.0% | 70.6% | 33 / 80 | 41.2% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 18 / 36 | 50.0% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 65 / 169 | 38.5% | 38.9% | 97 / 339 | 28.6% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 18 / 24 | too few to rate | 76.8% | 19 / 31 | 61.3% | 76.8% |
| To the legs | 38 / 40 | 95.0% | 87.8% | 3 / 3 | too few to rate | 87.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Christison L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med | vs Imes L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 38 / 111 | 34.2% | 40.7% | 115 / 253 | 45.5% | 40.7% |
| In the clinch | 41 / 62 | 66.1% | 70.6% | 31 / 51 | 60.8% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 32 / 73 | 43.8% | 72.0% | 39 / 63 | 61.9% | 72.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 67 / 196 | 34.2% | 38.8% | 138 / 316 | 43.7% | 38.8% |
| To the body | 38 / 44 | 86.4% | 75.1% | 19 / 21 | too few to rate | 75.1% |
| To the legs | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 84.4% | 28 / 30 | 93.3% | 84.4% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Imes has more cage time on record.