Cynthia Calvillo vs.
Amanda Cooper
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Cynthia Calvillo
Full career not yet synced for Cynthia Calvillo — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 2-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
Amanda Cooper
Full career not yet synced for Amanda Cooper — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.8 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Cynthia Calvillo
Distance 93.7% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 1.2% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 5.1% (norm 5.0%)
Amanda Cooper
Distance 80.7% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 2.5% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 16.8% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Cynthia Calvillo
Head 71.0% (norm 76.4%) · Body 19.8% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 9.1% (norm 9.1%)
Amanda Cooper
Head 87.3% (norm 76.4%) · Body 7.9% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 4.8% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Calvillo L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Cooper L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 639 / 1795 | 35.6% | 38.3% | 112 / 318 | 35.2% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 19 / 23 | too few to rate | 72.6% | 7 / 10 | too few to rate | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 78 / 98 | 79.6% | 75.0% | 55 / 66 | 83.3% | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 394 / 1361 | 28.9% | 35.4% | 134 / 344 | 39.0% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 224 / 380 | 58.9% | 69.3% | 23 / 31 | 74.2% | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 118 / 175 | 67.4% | 77.9% | 17 / 19 | too few to rate | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Calvillo L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Cooper L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 645 / 1833 | 35.2% | 39.7% | 107 / 265 | 40.4% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 36 / 67 | 53.7% | 71.5% | 9 / 10 | too few to rate | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 6 / 9 | too few to rate | 74.4% | 41 / 52 | 78.8% | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 418 / 1520 | 27.5% | 36.0% | 106 / 265 | 40.0% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 121 / 202 | 59.9% | 68.4% | 33 / 40 | 82.5% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 148 / 187 | 79.1% | 79.1% | 18 / 22 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Calvillo has more cage time on record.