Cory McKenna vs.
Jaqueline Amorim
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Cory McKenna
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 3 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 4 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.16 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 4 finish wins over 12 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
Jaqueline Amorim
Full career not yet synced for Jaqueline Amorim — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 3-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.9 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Cory McKenna
Distance 92.3% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 4.7% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 3.0% (norm 5.0%)
Jaqueline Amorim
Distance 49.1% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 1.1% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 49.8% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Cory McKenna
Head 92.7% (norm 76.4%) · Body 3.9% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 3.4% (norm 9.1%)
Jaqueline Amorim
Head 80.2% (norm 76.4%) · Body 14.7% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 5.1% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | McKenna L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Amorim L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 165 / 494 | 33.4% | 38.3% | 39 / 134 | 29.1% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 18 / 25 | 72.0% | 72.6% | 3 / 3 | too few to rate | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 13 / 16 | too few to rate | 75.0% | 93 / 136 | 68.4% | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 168 / 496 | 33.9% | 35.4% | 114 / 219 | 52.1% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 13 / 21 | too few to rate | 69.3% | 15 / 40 | 37.5% | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 15 / 18 | too few to rate | 77.9% | 6 / 14 | too few to rate | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs McKenna L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Amorim L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 214 / 427 | 50.1% | 39.7% | 51 / 172 | 29.7% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 51 / 62 | 82.3% | 71.5% | 22 / 28 | 78.6% | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 15 / 19 | too few to rate | 74.4% | 50 / 73 | 68.5% | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 157 / 362 | 43.4% | 36.0% | 103 / 240 | 42.9% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 69 / 81 | 85.2% | 68.4% | 13 / 23 | too few to rate | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 54 / 65 | 83.1% | 79.1% | 7 / 10 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Amorim has more cage time on record.