Cole Miller vs.
Andy Wang
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Cole Miller
Full career not yet synced for Cole Miller — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 3-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.2 wins over .500
Andy Wang
Full career not yet synced for Andy Wang — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Cole Miller
Distance 89.3% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 6.0% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 4.7% (norm 6.5%)
Andy Wang
Distance 54.5% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 45.5% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Cole Miller
Head 84.3% (norm 77.4%) · Body 10.2% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 5.5% (norm 7.8%)
Andy Wang
Head 72.7% (norm 78.2%) · Body 18.2% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 9.1% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Miller L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Wang L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 476 / 1621 | 29.4% | 40.9% | 1 / 6 | too few to rate | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 70 / 109 | 64.2% | 70.8% | 3 / 5 | too few to rate | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 59 / 86 | 68.6% | 69.2% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 421 / 1530 | 27.5% | 37.2% | 3 / 8 | too few to rate | 35.0% |
| To the body | 103 / 186 | 55.4% | 68.2% | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 81 / 100 | 81.0% | 80.7% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Miller L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Wang L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 574 / 1565 | 36.7% | 39.2% | 3 / 16 | too few to rate | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 66 / 115 | 57.4% | 70.3% | 1 / 4 | too few to rate | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 143 / 243 | 58.8% | 69.4% | 8 / 12 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 512 / 1568 | 32.7% | 35.9% | 11 / 29 | 37.9% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 130 / 188 | 69.1% | 67.9% | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 141 / 167 | 84.4% | 81.5% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Miller has more cage time on record.