Christina Marks vs.
Montana De La Rosa
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Christina Marks
Full career not yet synced for Christina Marks — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Montana De La Rosa
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 6 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 0 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.59 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 24 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.1 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Christina Marks
Distance 70.6% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 23.5% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 5.9% (norm 4.9%)
Montana De La Rosa
Distance 83.5% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 8.9% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 7.6% (norm 4.9%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Christina Marks
Head 76.5% (norm 78.1%) · Body 11.8% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 11.8% (norm 7.7%)
Montana De La Rosa
Head 85.2% (norm 78.1%) · Body 10.2% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 4.6% (norm 7.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Marks L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med | Rosa L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 7 / 12 | too few to rate | 39.9% | 300 / 952 | 31.5% | 39.9% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 73.3% | 53 / 101 | 52.5% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 74.7% | 71 / 87 | 81.6% | 74.7% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 6 / 13 | too few to rate | 34.9% | 302 / 971 | 31.1% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 69.5% | 78 / 116 | 67.2% | 69.5% |
| To the legs | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 82.6% | 44 / 53 | 83.0% | 82.6% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters · Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Marks L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med | vs Rosa L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 3 / 10 | too few to rate | 38.8% | 338 / 707 | 47.8% | 38.8% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 7 | too few to rate | 74.1% | 128 / 156 | 82.1% | 74.1% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 73.4% | 30 / 43 | 69.8% | 73.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 3 / 13 | too few to rate | 35.3% | 296 / 668 | 44.3% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 69.0% | 148 / 177 | 83.6% | 69.0% |
| To the legs | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 78.7% | 52 / 61 | 85.2% | 78.7% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Rosa has more cage time on record.