Chris Holdsworth vs. Chico Camus
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Chris Holdsworth
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 0 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.98 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 6 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Chico Camus
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 4 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 3 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.65 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 27 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Chris Holdsworth
Distance 86.2% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 2.9% (norm 6.4%)
Chico Camus
Distance 82.7% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 5.3% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 12.0% (norm 6.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Chris Holdsworth
Head 81.9% (norm 77.5%) · Body 13.8% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 4.3% (norm 8.4%)
Chico Camus
Head 90.7% (norm 77.5%) · Body 6.5% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 2.7% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Holdsworth L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Camus L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 31 / 119 | 26.1% | 39.2% | 221 / 606 | 36.5% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 9 / 15 | too few to rate | 69.0% | 27 / 39 | 69.2% | 69.0% |
| On the ground | 1 / 4 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 54 / 88 | 61.4% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 27 / 113 | 23.9% | 35.3% | 253 / 665 | 38.0% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 9 / 19 | too few to rate | 66.9% | 31 / 48 | 64.6% | 66.9% |
| To the legs | 5 / 6 | too few to rate | 79.2% | 18 / 20 | too few to rate | 79.2% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 121 fighters · Bantamweight: 121 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Holdsworth L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Camus L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 38 / 92 | 41.3% | 39.4% | 215 / 682 | 31.5% | 39.4% |
| In the clinch | 5 / 10 | too few to rate | 70.6% | 30 / 54 | 55.6% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 72.1% | 42 / 75 | 56.0% | 72.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 25 / 72 | 34.7% | 34.9% | 200 / 674 | 29.7% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 12 / 22 | too few to rate | 66.1% | 63 / 105 | 60.0% | 66.1% |
| To the legs | 6 / 9 | too few to rate | 78.8% | 24 / 32 | 75.0% | 78.8% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Camus has more cage time on record.