Chris Haseman vs. Evan Tanner
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Chris Haseman
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 20 | 16 |
Tier-weighted record quality: -0.13 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 16 finish wins over 37 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +4.0 wins over .500
Evan Tanner
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 11 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 15 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.2 · 11 tier-1/2 wins · 23 finish wins over 34 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.1 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Chris Haseman
Distance 45.0% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 35.0% (norm 8.8%) · Ground 20.0% (norm 10.6%)
Evan Tanner
Distance 46.5% (norm 79.5%) · Clinch 19.0% (norm 9.0%) · Ground 34.5% (norm 10.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Chris Haseman
Head 40.0% (norm 78.5%) · Body 30.0% (norm 11.8%) · Legs 30.0% (norm 9.7%)
Evan Tanner
Head 70.3% (norm 78.0%) · Body 20.2% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 9.4% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Haseman L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | Tanner L/A | Acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 5 / 9 | too few to rate | 41.5% | 129 / 301 | 42.9% | 40.5% |
| In the clinch | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 95 / 123 | 77.2% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 72.9% | 164 / 223 | 73.5% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 3 / 8 | too few to rate | 39.2% | 237 / 455 | 52.1% | 38.8% |
| To the body | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 72.0% | 97 / 131 | 74.0% | 71.6% |
| To the legs | 5 / 6 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 54 / 61 | 88.5% | 83.3% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 94 fighters · Middleweight: 178 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Haseman L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs Tanner L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 40.6% | 173 / 528 | 32.8% | 39.5% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 13 | too few to rate | 68.8% | 103 / 135 | 76.3% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 53 / 76 | 69.7% | 70.4% | 25 / 46 | 54.3% | 69.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 47 / 71 | 66.2% | 37.7% | 223 / 616 | 36.2% | 37.9% |
| To the body | 21 / 23 | too few to rate | 72.9% | 52 / 62 | 83.9% | 71.3% |
| To the legs | 2 / 4 | too few to rate | 83.1% | 26 / 31 | 83.9% | 82.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Tanner has more cage time on record.