Chelsea Chandler vs.
Priscila Cachoeira
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Chelsea Chandler
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.82 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 4 finish wins over 11 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Priscila Cachoeira
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 9 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.62 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 8 finish wins over 22 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.1 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Chelsea Chandler
Distance 74.8% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 13.9% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 11.3% (norm 7.5%)
Priscila Cachoeira
Distance 92.2% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 5.0% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 2.8% (norm 4.9%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Chelsea Chandler
Head 81.1% (norm 75.2%) · Body 17.3% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 1.6% (norm 8.8%)
Priscila Cachoeira
Head 85.0% (norm 78.1%) · Body 10.3% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 4.7% (norm 7.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Chandler L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Cachoeira L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 120 / 324 | 37.0% | 38.3% | 462 / 1097 | 42.1% | 39.9% |
| In the clinch | 41 / 60 | 68.3% | 73.3% | 42 / 60 | 70.0% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 34 / 49 | 69.4% | 70.8% | 24 / 33 | 72.7% | 74.7% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 137 / 351 | 39.0% | 37.7% | 394 / 1012 | 38.9% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 52 / 75 | 69.3% | 70.0% | 86 / 122 | 70.5% | 69.5% |
| To the legs | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 80.9% | 48 / 56 | 85.7% | 82.6% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Chandler L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Cachoeira L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 174 / 322 | 54.0% | 41.3% | 640 / 1338 | 47.8% | 38.8% |
| In the clinch | 51 / 58 | 87.9% | 74.7% | 50 / 88 | 56.8% | 74.1% |
| On the ground | 12 / 18 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 215 / 249 | 86.3% | 73.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 122 / 254 | 48.0% | 38.1% | 718 / 1425 | 50.4% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 65 / 91 | 71.4% | 73.2% | 127 / 183 | 69.4% | 69.0% |
| To the legs | 50 / 53 | 94.3% | 80.9% | 60 / 67 | 89.6% | 78.7% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Cachoeira has more cage time on record.