ChangHo Lee vs.
Xiao Long
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
ChangHo Lee
Full career not yet synced for ChangHo Lee — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.7 wins over .500
Xiao Long
Full career not yet synced for Xiao Long — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
ChangHo Lee
Distance 37.0% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 40.2% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 22.8% (norm 6.5%)
Xiao Long
Distance 80.1% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 18.6% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 1.3% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
ChangHo Lee
Head 61.6% (norm 77.4%) · Body 34.7% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 3.7% (norm 8.4%)
Xiao Long
Head 67.6% (norm 77.4%) · Body 18.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 14.4% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Lee L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Long L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 38 / 81 | 46.9% | 39.0% | 195 / 494 | 39.5% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 68 / 88 | 77.3% | 68.7% | 80 / 115 | 69.6% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 37 / 50 | 74.0% | 70.2% | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 80 / 135 | 59.3% | 34.9% | 157 / 417 | 37.6% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 58 / 76 | 76.3% | 66.8% | 67 / 111 | 60.4% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 5 / 8 | too few to rate | 79.4% | 58 / 89 | 65.2% | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Lee L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Long L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 52 / 90 | 57.8% | 39.3% | 141 / 318 | 44.3% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 50 / 69 | 72.5% | 70.4% | 93 / 120 | 77.5% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 72.4% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 51 / 94 | 54.3% | 34.9% | 124 / 306 | 40.5% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 40 / 54 | 74.1% | 66.0% | 98 / 117 | 83.8% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 11 / 11 | too few to rate | 79.1% | 12 / 15 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Long has more cage time on record.