Chad Mendes vs.
Ricardo Lamas
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Chad Mendes
Full career not yet synced for Chad Mendes — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 6-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.6 wins over .500
Ricardo Lamas
Full career not yet synced for Ricardo Lamas — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 7-6 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.3 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Chad Mendes
Distance 78.6% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 4.7% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 16.6% (norm 6.5%)
Ricardo Lamas
Distance 78.5% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 10.2% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 11.3% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Chad Mendes
Head 77.2% (norm 77.4%) · Body 6.5% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 16.4% (norm 7.8%)
Ricardo Lamas
Head 66.6% (norm 77.4%) · Body 12.8% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 20.6% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Mendes L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Lamas L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 260 / 596 | 43.6% | 40.9% | 392 / 951 | 41.2% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 24 / 36 | 66.7% | 70.8% | 110 / 123 | 89.4% | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 97 / 126 | 77.0% | 69.2% | 98 / 137 | 71.5% | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 257 / 585 | 43.9% | 37.2% | 295 / 807 | 36.6% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 33 / 49 | 67.3% | 68.2% | 125 / 155 | 80.6% | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 91 / 124 | 73.4% | 80.7% | 180 / 249 | 72.3% | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Mendes L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Lamas L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 292 / 965 | 30.3% | 39.2% | 406 / 1077 | 37.7% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 13 / 27 | 48.1% | 70.3% | 95 / 135 | 70.4% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 27 / 29 | 93.1% | 69.4% | 49 / 59 | 83.1% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 226 / 841 | 26.9% | 35.9% | 357 / 994 | 35.9% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 63 / 107 | 58.9% | 67.9% | 120 / 180 | 66.7% | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 43 / 73 | 58.9% | 81.5% | 73 / 97 | 75.3% | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Lamas has more cage time on record.