Chad Anheliger vs.
Cody Gibson
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Chad Anheliger
Full career not yet synced for Chad Anheliger — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.6 wins over .500
Cody Gibson
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 8 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 17 | 5 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.41 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 34 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.1 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Chad Anheliger
Distance 84.7% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 7.7% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 7.5% (norm 6.5%)
Cody Gibson
Distance 80.9% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 16.1% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 3.0% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Chad Anheliger
Head 80.1% (norm 77.4%) · Body 10.2% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 9.7% (norm 8.4%)
Cody Gibson
Head 78.9% (norm 77.4%) · Body 14.7% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 6.4% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Anheliger L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Gibson L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 173 / 439 | 39.4% | 39.0% | 284 / 695 | 40.9% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 29 / 40 | 72.5% | 68.7% | 102 / 138 | 73.9% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 26 / 39 | 66.7% | 70.2% | 17 / 26 | 65.4% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 157 / 415 | 37.8% | 34.9% | 269 / 678 | 39.7% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 31 / 53 | 58.5% | 66.8% | 88 / 126 | 69.8% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 40 / 50 | 80.0% | 79.4% | 46 / 55 | 83.6% | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Anheliger L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Gibson L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 146 / 374 | 39.0% | 39.3% | 269 / 677 | 39.7% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 23 / 31 | 74.2% | 70.4% | 82 / 124 | 66.1% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 44 / 59 | 74.6% | 72.4% | 33 / 49 | 67.3% | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 120 / 325 | 36.9% | 34.9% | 265 / 685 | 38.7% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 49 / 73 | 67.1% | 66.0% | 65 / 98 | 66.3% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 44 / 66 | 66.7% | 79.1% | 54 / 67 | 80.6% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Gibson has more cage time on record.