Cam Nelson vs. Ding Meng
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Cam Nelson
Full career not yet synced for Cam Nelson — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -1.0 wins over .500
Ding Meng
Full career not yet synced for Ding Meng — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Cam Nelson
Distance 42.9% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 2.9% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 54.3% (norm 8.1%)
Ding Meng
Distance 97.3% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 2.7% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Cam Nelson
Head 81.4% (norm 78.3%) · Body 2.9% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 15.7% (norm 8.0%)
Ding Meng
Head 51.1% (norm 78.3%) · Body 18.7% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 30.2% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Nelson L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Meng L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 15 / 30 | 50.0% | 38.5% | 96 / 219 | 43.8% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 67.8% | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 25 / 38 | 65.8% | 67.0% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 32 / 57 | 56.1% | 36.4% | 25 / 115 | 21.7% | 36.4% |
| To the body | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 21 / 42 | 50.0% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 8 / 11 | too few to rate | 83.0% | 56 / 68 | 82.4% | 83.0% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 180 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Nelson L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Meng L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 34 / 74 | 45.9% | 39.1% | 86 / 181 | 47.5% | 39.1% |
| In the clinch | 5 / 5 | too few to rate | 68.9% | 2 / 4 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 25 / 38 | 65.8% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 12 / 41 | 29.3% | 35.6% | 93 / 192 | 48.4% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 13 / 21 | too few to rate | 69.6% | 8 / 16 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 14 / 17 | too few to rate | 82.2% | 12 / 15 | too few to rate | 82.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Meng has more cage time on record.