Cale Yarbrough vs.
Tim Credeur
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Cale Yarbrough
Full career not yet synced for Cale Yarbrough — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Tim Credeur
Full career not yet synced for Tim Credeur — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 2-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Cale Yarbrough
Distance 100.0% (norm 79.4%) · Clinch 0.0% (norm 9.1%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 10.3%)
Tim Credeur
Distance 93.9% (norm 79.4%) · Clinch 3.3% (norm 9.1%) · Ground 2.8% (norm 10.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Cale Yarbrough
Head 77.3% (norm 78.0%) · Body 9.1% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 13.6% (norm 8.4%)
Tim Credeur
Head 91.7% (norm 78.0%) · Body 6.4% (norm 13.4%) · Legs 1.9% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Yarbrough L/A | Acc | Middleweight med | Credeur L/A | Acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 6 / 22 | too few to rate | 40.5% | 117 / 398 | 29.4% | 40.5% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.3% | 8 / 14 | too few to rate | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 69.1% | 6 / 12 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 2 / 17 | too few to rate | 38.9% | 104 / 389 | 26.7% | 38.9% |
| To the body | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 71.7% | 19 / 27 | 70.4% | 71.7% |
| To the legs | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 83.3% | 8 / 8 | too few to rate | 83.3% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Middleweight: 174 fighters · Middleweight: 174 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Yarbrough L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med | vs Credeur L/A | Opp acc | Middleweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 17 / 66 | 25.8% | 39.5% | 81 / 188 | 43.1% | 39.5% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.9% | 3 / 7 | too few to rate | 70.9% |
| On the ground | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 69.0% | 30 / 76 | 39.5% | 69.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 19 / 66 | 28.8% | 37.9% | 70 / 200 | 35.0% | 37.9% |
| To the body | 0 / 2 | too few to rate | 71.3% | 24 / 44 | 54.5% | 71.3% |
| To the legs | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 20 / 27 | 74.1% | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Credeur has more cage time on record.