Bruna Brasil vs.
Wang Cong
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Bruna Brasil
Full career not yet synced for Bruna Brasil — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.7 wins over .500
Wang Cong
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 5 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.55 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 4 finish wins over 11 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Bruna Brasil
Distance 84.8% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 11.9% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 3.3% (norm 5.0%)
Wang Cong
Distance 93.0% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 4.4% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 2.7% (norm 4.9%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Bruna Brasil
Head 57.1% (norm 76.4%) · Body 29.4% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 13.5% (norm 9.1%)
Wang Cong
Head 61.5% (norm 78.1%) · Body 18.5% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 20.0% (norm 7.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Brasil L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Cong L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 188 / 364 | 51.6% | 38.3% | 434 / 768 | 56.5% | 39.9% |
| In the clinch | 45 / 51 | 88.2% | 72.6% | 29 / 36 | 80.6% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 9 / 14 | too few to rate | 75.0% | 15 / 22 | too few to rate | 74.7% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 100 / 245 | 40.8% | 35.4% | 225 / 508 | 44.3% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 98 / 126 | 77.8% | 69.3% | 114 / 153 | 74.5% | 69.5% |
| To the legs | 44 / 58 | 75.9% | 77.9% | 139 / 165 | 84.2% | 82.6% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Brasil L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Cong L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 326 / 691 | 47.2% | 39.7% | 181 / 472 | 38.3% | 38.8% |
| In the clinch | 47 / 62 | 75.8% | 71.5% | 16 / 23 | too few to rate | 74.1% |
| On the ground | 34 / 52 | 65.4% | 74.4% | 0 / 3 | too few to rate | 73.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 172 / 464 | 37.1% | 36.0% | 115 / 368 | 31.2% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 125 / 190 | 65.8% | 68.4% | 46 / 78 | 59.0% | 69.0% |
| To the legs | 110 / 151 | 72.8% | 79.1% | 36 / 52 | 69.2% | 78.7% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Brasil has more cage time on record.